The strongest content stops at the border

Legal publishers are authoritative and editorially rigorous, one market at a time: decades of curated primary and secondary law, taxonomies and editorial discipline nobody else can match within a jurisdiction. The organising principle is the jurisdiction itself. Content is curated within a legal system, by its experts, for its practitioners.

That is correct for a lookup product. It becomes a gap in an answer product, because comparison across systems was always left to the reader, and readers now ask systems instead.

The comparative layer has no natural owner

Where AI is layered on top of per jurisdiction content, it inherits the same structure. And in houses built from acquired national publishers, each operating largely independently, the comparative layer has no natural owner. Every market is deep. The space between markets belongs to no one.

The network behind the data

Anyone can machine translate legal text. Explaining how legal concepts actually differ across jurisdictions takes people who know the law on both sides of the border. TransLegal’s data is built with lawyer-linguists and academics at more than twenty partner universities, among them Dar es Salaam, Kyung Hee, Saint Joseph of Beirut, SRM (India) and Rijeka: one coordinated global system behind 600,000+ translated legal terms. For a publisher, that is the difference between adding more content and adding authority your platform can stand behind.

Built the other way around

TransLegal is built the other way around: legal concepts mapped across jurisdictions as functionally analogous, partially overlapping or structurally distinct, with non-equivalence explicitly identified and highlighted.

The work is editorial in the way publishers understand editorial: named experts, a documented method, human curation at the core, built jurisdiction by jurisdiction with university law faculties and, where agreed, from a publisher’s own primary sources. It is designed as a complement to the publisher’s depth rather than a competitor to it. The publisher keeps the depth per market. The comparative layer connects the markets.

Founded 1989 · 20+ university law faculties · hundreds of lawyer-linguists · 600,000+ translated legal terms · projects in 65+ countries

Meet the network

Our data demo illustrates how we match concepts across jurisdictions, preserving and highlighting differences instead of smoothing them away.

See the data demo · Talk to us

Comparing markets was never anyone’s job. Until now.